PokerStars CasinoTrusted
Welcome offer · Casino welcome offer up to €100
Visit casino18+ · T&Cs apply · ad
The register · a collection
The multiplier, not the headline, decides what a bonus is worth
A bonus is not a gift, it is a contract with a turnover clause. The wagering multiplier is the price of that clause. Above roughly 30x, the requirement usually costs more than the bonus is worth.
18+ Every market
Every operator here carries at least one live bonus with a wagering requirement of 30x or lower, taken from the operator's own published bonus terms. We also record whether the multiplier applies to the bonus alone or to deposit plus bonus, because the same number means very different things. The rule is mechanical, and no operator can pay to be on it.
3 operators qualify · 18+ · T&Cs apply
CasumoTrusted
Welcome offer · Welcome offer: 100% up to €300 + 20 free spins
Visit casino18+ · T&Cs apply · ad
888 CasinoTrusted
Welcome offer · Welcome bonus up to €200
Visit casino18+ · T&Cs apply · ad
The detail
The multiplier, not the headline, decides what a bonus is worth
A bonus is a contract, and the multiplier is its price
Nobody in this industry is giving money away. A bonus is a marketing instrument with a turnover clause attached, and the clause is the product. The headline — "200% up to $500" — is the part designed to be remembered. The multiplier is the part designed to be skimmed.
The multiplier tells you how much money must pass through the games before the balance becomes withdrawable. And because every one of those games carries a house edge, turnover has a cost. That cost is the real price of the bonus, and it is calculable.
The arithmetic the industry does not print
A typical slot returns about 96% of what is staked, over a very large number of spins. That means the house edge is roughly 4%, and every $100 that passes through the game costs about $4 in expectation.
So take a $100 bonus with wagering applied to the bonus alone, and run the multiplier out:
| Wagering | Turnover required | Expected cost of that turnover | Against a $100 bonus |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10x | $1,000 | $40 | 40% of the bonus consumed |
| 20x | $2,000 | $80 | 80% consumed |
| 25x | $2,500 | $100 | The entire bonus consumed |
| 30x | $3,000 | $120 | 120% — the clause costs more than the gift |
| 40x | $4,000 | $160 | 160% |
| 50x | $5,000 | $200 | 200% — twice the face value |
| 60x | $6,000 | $240 | 240% |
Read the 25x row. On a typical slot, that is the point at which the expected cost of clearing the bonus equals the entire face value of the bonus. Everything below it is an offer where the requirement is cheaper than the gift. Everything above it is an offer where the requirement is more expensive than the gift.
The break-even point moves with the game. On a 94% slot it arrives at about 17x. On a 97% slot it stretches to about 33x. That real range — call it 17x to 33x — is why the rule on this page is set at 30x: near the top of the honest range, deliberately generous, because a stricter line would leave this page nearly empty and we would rather publish a rule you can check than a rule that flatters us.
Above 30x, on any realistic game selection, the turnover clause costs more than the bonus is worth. That is the whole finding, and it is why this page exists.
What this arithmetic does not say
It does not say that a low-wagering bonus makes money. Nothing on this page, and nothing at any casino, makes gambling a way to make money.
The 96% figure is a long-run average over an enormous number of spins. You will not play an enormous number of spins. Your actual result is dominated by variance, and the single most common outcome of any bonus attempt is that the balance reaches zero before the wagering is complete. Meanwhile the operator caps the other end: a maximum-win clause truncates the top of the distribution, so the rare large outcome is the one you are not paid in full for.
The same number, twice the cost: deposit plus bonus
Here is the trick that hides in plain sight. Two operators both advertise 30x wagering. They are not the same offer.
| Headline | Wagering applies to | On a $100 deposit + $100 bonus | Expected cost at 4% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 30x | The bonus only | $3,000 turnover | $120 |
| 30x | Deposit plus bonus | $6,000 turnover | $240 |
Identical number. Double the requirement. Double the cost. An operator advertising "30x (D+B)" is offering you something materially worse than one advertising 35x on the bonus alone, and the headline is doing everything it can to stop you noticing.
We record the base alongside the multiplier on every offer in the bonus register, because a multiplier without its base is not information.
Game weighting: how a $3,000 requirement becomes $30,000
The second clause worth reading is game weighting. Not every game contributes equally to the turnover you owe.
| Game | Typical weighting | A $3,000 requirement becomes |
|---|---|---|
| Slots | 100% | $3,000 |
| Video poker | 10% to 20% | $15,000 to $30,000 |
| Roulette | 10%, or excluded | $30,000, or it does not count at all |
| Blackjack | 10%, or excluded | $30,000, or it does not count at all |
There is a reason the low-house-edge games are the ones weighted down or excluded, and it is not an accident of scheduling. The games where turnover is cheapest to generate are precisely the games the operator will not let you generate it in. The weighting table exists to stop you clearing the bonus cheaply. Read it before you accept the offer, not after.
Two smaller clauses do the same work: a maximum bet while wagering — usually around $5, and breaching it typically voids the bonus and everything won with it — and a time limit, usually 7 to 30 days, which forces the turnover into a compressed window and pushes players into larger stakes than they intended. Both are catalogued on the operator profile, and both take points off the TrustAudit Index where the wording is predatory.
How to price any bonus in ninety seconds
- 01Find the multiplier and its base. Bonus only, or deposit plus bonus? If deposit plus bonus, double the number in your head before comparing.
- 02Multiply out the actual turnover. Multiplier times base. This is the only number that matters.
- 03Take 4% of it. That is roughly what the requirement costs to clear on a typical slot.
- 04Compare that to the bonus. If the cost exceeds the bonus, the clause is worth more than the gift, and the offer is a charge dressed as a present.
- 05Then find the maximum-win cap, because it can make all of the above irrelevant. A cap of $100 on a $500 bonus means the ceiling on the entire exercise is $100.
The best bonus is often no bonus
An unusual conclusion for an affiliate site, and we mean it. A bonus locks your own deposit behind a turnover requirement. Without one, you can withdraw whenever you like. With one, you have contracted to keep playing — and that contract, not the money, is what the operator bought.
If you take a bonus, take a cheap one. That is what this page is for. Then read what withdrawal caps do to a win, and why a no-deposit bonus is not free. If the play has stopped feeling like a cost you chose, free and independent help is here.
Questions
Frequently asked
What does 30x wagering actually mean?
It means you must stake 30 times the bonus amount before the balance becomes withdrawable. A $100 bonus at 30x requires $3,000 of turnover. Crucially, that is $3,000 passing through the games — not $3,000 of losses. The same money is staked repeatedly. But because every spin carries a house edge, that turnover has a cost: on a typical slot returning 96%, pushing $3,000 through costs about $120 in expectation, which is more than the $100 bonus is worth. That is why 30x is roughly where the value line sits.
Is a lower wagering requirement always better?
It is better on the one axis it measures, but it is not the whole offer, and operators know that. A 10x bonus with a $50 maximum-win cap, a 7-day time limit and slots-only eligibility can easily be worth less than a 30x bonus with no cap and 30 days to clear it. Check four things in this order: the multiplier, the base it applies to, the maximum-win cap, and the game weighting. A low multiplier attached to a hard cashout cap is a headline, not a good offer.
Why is 30x the line rather than 25x?
Because the break-even point depends on the game and moves with its return-to-player rate. On a 94% slot the expected cost of clearing equals the bonus at about 17x; on a typical 96% slot, at about 25x; on a 97% slot, at about 33x. The honest range is roughly 17x to 33x. We set the machine rule at 30x — near the top of that range and deliberately generous — because a stricter line would leave the page nearly empty. We would rather publish a rule you can check than one that flatters us.
What is the difference between bonus-only and deposit-plus-bonus wagering?
It is the difference between a $3,000 requirement and a $6,000 one, on the same headline number. If wagering applies to the bonus alone, a $100 bonus at 30x means $3,000 of turnover. If it applies to deposit plus bonus, a $100 deposit and a $100 bonus at the same 30x means $6,000 — twice the requirement and twice the cost to clear. Two operators can both advertise '30x' and be offering materially different products. We publish the base alongside the multiplier for exactly this reason.
Can I clear a bonus by playing blackjack or roulette?
Usually not, and where you can it is far more expensive than it looks. Table games are typically weighted at 10% or excluded outright, so $100 staked at roulette contributes $10 toward the requirement — turning a $3,000 obligation into $30,000 of actual play. This is not an oversight. The low-house-edge games are the cheapest way to generate turnover, so those are precisely the games the operator will not let you use. Read the weighting table in the bonus terms before you accept, not after.
Can I lose the bonus after I have already met the wagering?
Yes, and the usual instruments are a maximum-bet limit breached during play, a maximum-win cap applied at cashout, or a clause voiding winnings for play the operator unilaterally deems irregular. The max-bet clause is the one that catches most people: a single spin above roughly $5 while wagering is often enough to void the bonus and everything won with it. We catalogue these as unfair clauses and they cost the operator points on its TrustAudit Index. If it happens to you and you believe you are owed, file a case.
Can a casino pay to appear on this page?
No. The list is generated by a rule in code: at least one live bonus at 30x wagering or lower, taken from the operator's own published terms. There is no sponsored slot, no editorial override, and the ordering comes from the same scoring engine that orders the whole register. We earn commission when you click through to an operator and we disclose it at every link, but commercial terms have no code path into any score or any inclusion rule on this site.
Does a low-wagering bonus make gambling profitable?
No. It makes a bonus cheaper, which is a different claim entirely. The house edge is built into every game and is not removed by any bonus — over any meaningful number of bets, the expected outcome of play is a loss. The 96% return figure is a long-run average across an enormous number of spins, not a forecast for your session; your actual result is dominated by variance, and the most common outcome of a bonus attempt is a zero balance before the wagering is done. A low multiplier changes the size of the cost, never its direction.
Keep exploring